JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 19, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Yenny Eliza Andrade Pantoja·Respondent Emssanar E.S..S. Y Otro

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez Constitucional
  • Debe observar estrictamente la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional sobre criterios que determinan la competencia en materia de tutela
Superior Funcional
  • Debe asumir diligentemente las funciones que le corresponden y decidir la impugnación presentada
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Conflicto de competencia suscitado entre la Sala de Decisión Sistema Oral del Tribunal Administrativo de Nariño y la Sala de Decisión Civil Familia del Tribunal Superior de Pasto.

La controversia se generó en torno a las diferentes interpretaciones que hicieron las autoridades involucradas respecto a la competencia funcional para resolver la impugnación formulada contra la providencia proferida por el Juzgado Primero de Familia de Pasto.

La Corte considera que quien debe resolver el recurso de alzada de manera inmediata y proferir la decisión de segunda instancia que corresponda es la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Pasto.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. DEJAR SIN EFECTOS el auto proferido el 8 de agosto de 2017 por la Sala de Decision Civil Familia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Pasto, dentro de la accion de tutela promovida por Yenny Eliza Andrade Pantoja, en representacion de su hija menor de edad S.D.T.A., en contra de EMSSANAR ESS y del IDSN.
  2. SEGUNDO. REMITIR el expediente ICC-3431 a Sala de Decision Civil Familia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Pasto para que, de manera inmediata, tramite y adopte la decision de fondo a la que haya lugar respecto de la impugnacion presentada por EMSSANAR ESS.
  3. TERCERO. Por intermedio de la Secretaria General de la Corporacion, COMUNICAR a las partes, y a la Sala de Decision Sistema Oral del Tribunal Administrativo de Narino la decision adoptada en esta providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceAlberto Rojas Ríos
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.